HAYWARD GORDON
Impeller Technology


The following are Hayward Gordon's most commonly available Mixing Impellers, the function of each design and the most appropriate applications. Hayward Gordon not only offers the complete range of conventional mixing impellers but also designs and manufactures custom impellers for unique applications.

AL Hydrofoil


  • The most flow efficient impeller for low viscosity (up to 2500 cps) blending applications.
  • Also used on solid suspension mixing problems where a relatively low percent solids will be encountered (free settling applications).
  • This design is the narrowest blade hydrofoil and therefore is sometimes referred to as a "low solidity" hydrofoil.

AM Hydrofoil


  • The AM Hydrofoil with its slightly wider blade than the AL design is useful on applications where viscosities of 2,000 to 5,000 cps are encountered or when a small amount of gas handling capability is required.
  • Commonly applied to solid suspension applications which have a relatively high percent solids (35-55%) particularly when solid size is small which sets up an apparent viscosity in the slurry.
  • This type of hydrofoil is sometimes referred to as a "mild solidity" design.


AM Hydrofoil

Back to top

  • The AH Hydrofoil is characterized by a very wide blade and can be used on applications with viscosities up to 75,000 cps.
  • This design is the impeller of choice when coarse gas dispersion is required combined with high flow velocities for blending or solids suspension.
  • This type of hydrofoil is sometimes referred to as a "high solidity" design.

HP Impeller


  • The HP impeller is more flow efficient than a PBT and therefore imparts less shear into the fluid but more so when compared to hydrofoil designs.
  • The HP power number lies between the PBT and the AL which is indicative of its flow and shear characteristics.
  • This impeller is useful on taller tank applications because it can invest the same or greater torque into a fluid at lower speeds than an AL impeller, normally allowing longer shaft lengths.

PBT Impeller


  • The Pitched Blade Turbine is more flow efficient than the radial style impellers and produces more fluid shear than the hydrofoil impellers.
  • The impeller of choice when both flow velocity and fluid shear is required and/or when very high mixing intensity is required when the use of a hydrofoil would result in too high a tip speed or operating speed.
  • Most common configuration is 4 blades pitched at 45° with the most common types being either 3 or 4 blades pitched at 32°.
  • The 32° variety can handle slightly higher viscosity and is useful in low level mixing operations.
  • This style of impeller is the least expensive axial flow impeller.

RBT Impeller

Back to top


  • The Radial Blade Turbine is ideal when very high torque is required for blending applications at the expense of flow efficiency.
  • Other uses for this impeller include high shear applications other than gas dispersion (i.e., liquid-liquid emulsions, solids scrubbing or where low level mixing requirements need an impeller located close to the tank bottom).

RSB Impeller


  • The curved blade or retreat curve turbine is the most flow efficient radial flow impeller.
  • Used in flow sensitive (maximum pumping desired) applications when pumping in the radial direction is required.
  • Typical applications include plug flow break-up, heat transfer, low level blending, and low level solid suspension.

RD Impeller

Back to top


  • This vertical flat blade, radial flow, disc-type turbine is available as both a 4 and 6 blade design, with the 6 blade version being the most common.
  • This high shear device is normally employed on gas dispersion applications.
  • The style is commonly referred to as the Rushton impeller.

RDC Impeller


  • This impeller is similar to the Rushton turbine except curved blades are substituted for the vertical flat blades resulting in a lower power number.
  • It is able to handle more gas before flooding and does not experience as great a power drop-off due to gas loading than the Rushton turbine.
  • However, at elevated power levels it produces similar mass transfer as the Rushton design.
Back to top