| |
AL Hydrofoil | |
 |
- The most flow efficient impeller for low viscosity (up to 2500 cps) blending applications.
- Also used on solid suspension mixing problems where a relatively low percent solids will be encountered (free settling applications).
- This design is the narrowest blade hydrofoil and therefore is sometimes referred to as a "low solidity" hydrofoil.
|
| |
 |
- The AM Hydrofoil with its slightly wider blade than the AL design is useful on applications where viscosities of 2,000 to 5,000 cps are encountered or when a small amount of gas handling capability is required.
- Commonly applied to solid suspension applications which have a relatively high percent solids (35-55%) particularly when solid size is small which sets up an apparent viscosity in the slurry.
- This type of hydrofoil is sometimes referred to as a "mild solidity" design.
|
AM Hydrofoil | Back to top
|
| - The AH Hydrofoil is characterized by a very wide blade and can be used on applications with viscosities up to 75,000 cps.
- This design is the impeller of choice when coarse gas dispersion is required combined with high flow velocities for blending or solids suspension.
- This type of hydrofoil is sometimes referred to as a "high solidity" design.
|
HP Impeller | |
 |
- The HP impeller is more flow efficient than a PBT and therefore imparts less shear into the fluid but more so when compared to hydrofoil designs.
- The HP power number lies between the PBT and the AL which is indicative of its flow and shear characteristics.
- This impeller is useful on taller tank applications because it can invest the same or greater torque into a fluid at lower speeds than an AL impeller, normally allowing longer shaft lengths.
|
PBT Impeller | |
 |
- The Pitched Blade Turbine is more flow efficient than the radial style impellers and produces more fluid shear than the hydrofoil impellers.
- The impeller of choice when both flow velocity and fluid shear is required and/or when very high mixing intensity is required when the use of a hydrofoil would result in too high a tip speed or operating speed.
- Most common configuration is 4 blades pitched at 45° with the most common types being either 3 or 4 blades pitched at 32°.
- The 32° variety can handle slightly higher viscosity and is useful in low level mixing operations.
- This style of impeller is the least expensive axial flow impeller.
|
RBT Impeller | Back to top
|
 |
- The Radial Blade Turbine is ideal when very high torque is required for blending applications at the expense of flow efficiency.
- Other uses for this impeller include high shear applications other than gas dispersion (i.e., liquid-liquid emulsions, solids scrubbing or where low level mixing requirements need an impeller located close to the tank bottom).
|
RSB Impeller | |
 |
- The curved blade or retreat curve turbine is the most flow efficient radial flow impeller.
- Used in flow sensitive (maximum pumping desired) applications when pumping in the radial direction is required.
- Typical applications include plug flow break-up, heat transfer, low level blending, and low level solid suspension.
|
RD Impeller | Back to top
|
 |
- This vertical flat blade, radial flow, disc-type turbine is available as both a 4 and 6 blade design, with the 6 blade version being the most common.
- This high shear device is normally employed on gas dispersion applications.
- The style is commonly referred to as the Rushton impeller.
|
RDC Impeller | |
 |
- This impeller is similar to the Rushton turbine except curved blades are substituted for the vertical flat blades resulting in a lower power number.
- It is able to handle more gas before flooding and does not experience as great a power drop-off due to gas loading than the Rushton turbine.
- However, at elevated power levels it produces similar mass transfer as the Rushton design.
|